Supplement Evidence Report
Current evidence-label distribution across the public research library, with transparent scope and caveats.
Writer & journalist media kit
Research resources you can verify and cite
Start with the underlying research asset, not a promotional pitch. These resources are designed to make scope, methodology, caveats, source trails, data downloads, and reusable visuals easy to inspect before you cite The Hippie Scientist.
Research resources
Downloadable evidence dataset — CSV
Machine-readable aggregate/source data for reproducible analysis where the public dataset permits reuse.
Downloadable evidence dataset — JSON
Structured JSON for programmatic inspection, with the Evidence Report providing scope and interpretation context.
Research methodology
How evidence is categorized, how conflicts are handled, and what the grades are intended to mean.
Evidence Checker
A fast way to inspect evidence strength for individual research topics before quoting a claim.
Citation Explorer
Trace study-level records and source context before turning a site summary into a reported claim.
Infographics and visual resources
Reusable visual research assets. Follow the attribution and source-guide requirements shown with each published graphic.
Corrections and evidence changes
Review material corrections and use evidence changes as reporting hooks only after the underlying reason is verified.
Citation guidance
For aggregate statistics, cite the named Evidence Report and include the date you accessed it. The dataset changes as records are reviewed.
For a claim about a specific ingredient, cite the ingredient page and preferably the primary study or review linked beside that claim.
Do not describe Hippie Scientist evidence grades as medical guidelines or externally validated clinical ratings. They are a transparent editorial framework.
When reusing a chart or infographic, preserve its attribution, qualifiers, and link to the source page so readers can inspect the underlying context.
What makes a useful pitch to us
Corrections, missing primary studies, reproducible data issues, evidence changes, outdated statistics, and genuinely broken research-resource links are welcome. Product placement offers do not change evidence grades.
Press and supporting-data questions
Use the contact page and identify the article, deadline, and exact statistic or research object you need verified. Requests are easier to answer accurately when the required source trail is explicit.
- Publication or project name and, when available, the working article URL.
- Deadline and time zone.
- The exact statistic, claim, chart, ingredient, or source trail you need checked.
- Whether you need aggregate data, a primary-study trail, a reusable graphic, or methodology context.
What we can verify — and what we will not improvise
Reporter responses should return the underlying source object, scope, methodology, and caveats. If a number or scientific claim cannot be verified before a deadline, the project should say that rather than supplying an unverified quote. The same rule applies to evidence-change pitches and replacement statistics offered during outreach.