Evidence Database

Supplement Evidence Lookup

Search 565 compounds by name or filter by clinical evidence tier — from strong human trials to mechanism-only data. The list is generated from the current research library, so it stays aligned as the workbook changes.

1(1 compound)
2(1 compound)
5(1 compound)
A(49 compounds)
B(46 compounds)
C(64 compounds)
D(22 compounds)
E(26 compounds)
F(15 compounds)
G(42 compounds)
H(16 compounds)
I(14 compounds)
J(1 compound)
K(7 compounds)
L(25 compounds)
M(38 compounds)
N(16 compounds)
O(18 compounds)
P(47 compounds)
Q(1 compound)
R(10 compounds)
S(38 compounds)
T(25 compounds)
U(8 compounds)
V(18 compounds)
W(8 compounds)
X(1 compound)
Y(3 compounds)
Z(4 compounds)

Evidence Tier Guide

Strong: Multiple high-quality human trials with consistent findings.

Moderate: Several human trials with generally positive findings.

Limited: Few human trials, small samples, or mixed results.

Mechanism: Only mechanistic or animal data. No solid human trials.

Learning context

How this concept connects to supplement decisions

Search herbs and compounds by evidence grade, from human clinical support to mechanism-only data. Compare what has real evidence with what remains preliminary. Learning pages explain the reasoning layer behind the herb and compound library. They are designed to make mechanisms, evidence quality, safety tradeoffs, and product claims easier to interpret.

Use Supplement Evidence Lookup to build better questions before choosing a supplement: what outcome is being targeted, what mechanism is claimed, what human evidence exists, what dose was studied, and what risks could change the answer for a specific person?

Mechanistic plausibility is useful, but it should be weighed against trial design, safety history, product quality, and the possibility that a simpler intervention may be more appropriate.