We use privacy-friendly analytics. Read our privacy policy.

Compound Profile

Echinacea

Echinacea carries a Grade B rating — moderate evidence.

Review needed — allergic reactions, especially ragweed allergy Details

Last reviewed: •1 source citedReport a correctionProfile-wide ·B Moderate
Echinacea monograph visual
The Hippie Scientist

At a glance

From this profile's structured data
Evidence
Grade B
Safety
allergic reactions, especially ragweed allergy
Profile context
immune signaling
Next steps

Continue reading

Quick stats

Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Typical onset
Varies by prep
Safety rating
Review needed: Safety review pending
Best for
Immune Signaling
Avoid / review if
Organ Transplant Or Immunosuppressant Medications Due To Reduced Drug Effectiveness, Ragweed Or Marigold Or Daisy Family Allergy Due To Cross Reactivity, Long Term Use Beyond Eight Weeks Is Not Well Studied

Safety

Safety & Cautions

allergic reactions, especially ragweed allergy

Elevated caution

Caution level: Elevated. One caution category applies — read it before use.

  • Interaction-AwareMedication or interaction context is explicitly noted.

Evidence Summary

Profile-wide ·B Moderate

Evidence lens

Useful signal, but study design, dose, and population still matter.

ModerateModerate evidence

Human clinical evidence: Present in source signals

Mechanistic / preclinical: Mechanism mapped — Inflammatory Signaling Modulation · Oxidative Stress Modulation · Immune Signaling Modulation

Research maturity: Established research — main contexts: Immune Signaling

Safety boundary: Safety note available — allergic reactions, especially ragweed allergy

This profile cites 1 human study.

Evidence Strength

Confidence estimate based on the design quality and consistency of published clinical trials.

Moderate evidence

Echinacea has a moderate evidence rating.

AdaptogenStress & MoodLongevity
Citation density
1.0
Sources
1
Effects
1
Research recency
Mixed recency
Evidence Grade

Grade B: Moderate Evidence

Evaluation of methodological rigor, population reach, and evidence alignment.

Design Match
Meta analysis
Risk of Bias
Low
Consistency
Mixed
Strongest recorded design is a meta analysis, drawn from 2 recorded studies, 2 in people. Findings across those studies disagree.
How evidence grades work

Each grade reflects the strength and consistency of published human evidence — not marketing claims. Grades are based on study count, design quality, effect size, consistency, and recency.

Strong
Multiple RCTs, consistent direction, adequate effect size
Moderate
Some RCTs or consistent observational data in humans
Preliminary / Mixed
Animal or in-vitro only, or conflicting human data
Traditional / Theoretical
Traditional use only; no controlled human trials
Clinical Study Summaries (1)1 human evidence source · 0 human trials · ~4,631 participants across 1 human evidence source with reported N · Consistency not yet classifiable

What the evidence actually shows

This table contains 1 structured source, including 1 human evidence source; 0 are human trials. Across 1 human evidence source with a reported sample size, the approximate participant total is 4,631; overlapping publications may include some of the same people.

StudyDesignNDoseDurationPopulationOutcomeResult & magnitudeSource

Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold

PubMed · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2014

Background
Meta-analysis

Statistically combines results from multiple eligible studies; confidence still depends on the quality, consistency, and directness of those studies.

n=4631—————PubMed →

How Echinacea Works

Simplified mechanism pathway based on preclinical and pharmacological evidence. Does not confirm clinical efficacy.

Mechanism Pathway — How Echinacea Works

How Echinacea WorksEchinacea acts on biological target pathways via anti inflammatory, leading to immune signaling.EchinaceaBiological TargetBiological pathwayAnti InflammatoryImmune SignalingObservable outcomeAntioxidantParallel pathway
CompoundTarget / ReceptorMechanismEffect / Outcome

Dosing

Common form
capsule or standardized extract
No standardized dose
Our source data records the usual product form for this ingredient but no studied dose. Preparations differ widely, so follow the standardization on the product you actually have and speak to a clinician before starting.
Mechanisms & biological pathways

Preclinical mechanism details from scientific profiles; these represent plausible pathways but do not guarantee clinical efficacy in humans.

  • Inflammatory Signaling Modulation
  • Oxidative Stress Modulation
  • Immune Signaling Modulation

Guides that use Echinacea

Continue exploring

Related research paths

Compare & Sourcing

Compare side-by-side tradeoffs or verify active marker guidelines.

Free safety checklist

Get the Echinacea evidence notes

Occasional research updates, safety context, and product-quality checks for supplement decisions.

We use your email to send the checklist and occasional evidence-first supplement updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.

Sourcing options

Echinacea product picks

Recommendation status

Product recommendations are not shown for this profile because the current site safety and monetization policy does not permit them.

Product form & quality guidelines

When sourcing Echinacea, verify the label for:

  • Standardized Extract: Confirm active content percentages on the supplement facts panel (e.g. standardized to specific marker compounds) rather than simple raw herb weights.
  • Third-Party Testing: Look for independent purity labels (USP, NSF, ConsumerLab, or Eurofins) to ensure the product is free from heavy metals, solvents, and contaminants.
  • Form Bioavailability: Ensure the form matches evidence-supported configurations (e.g. chelated bisglycinate/glycinate for magnesium, micronized monohydrate for creatine) for optimal onset and digestion tolerance.

Safety first · Harm reduction

This information is educational and not medical advice. Start low, avoid risky combinations, and consult a licensed clinician before making health decisions—especially if you use medications, have diagnosed conditions, or are pregnant/breastfeeding.

Learn how we evaluate confidence, safety, and intensity on the methodology page.

Editorial Review

Checked against primary sources, cited evidence, and contraindication language before publication. Evidence claims, safety language, and affiliate modules are reviewed independently. Not personal medical advice.

Editorial Standards →

Help improve this profile

Was this useful for your research?

These controls record only the page and the structured choice you make when analytics consent is enabled. Please don’t include personal medical information in research requests.

Was this evidence summary clear?

Did you find what you were researching?